Abstract

This study aims to: 1) Test the effectiveness of using simple and complex problem-based learning models in improving students' creative thinking abilities; 2) Test the effectiveness of simple and complex problem-based learning models in improving students' creative thinking skills based on different academic abilities. This research is quasi-experimental with a pretest-posttest nonequivalent control group design involved 96 students grade VII taken by cluster random sampling included a control class with a simple problem-solving model (PSS), experimental class 1 using the Creative Problem Solving (CPS) learning model, and experimental class 2 using the IDEAL-Problem solving (IPS) learning model. The hypothesis test using N-Gain Score and ANCOVA. The results showed: 1) problem-based learning models are generally effective in improving students' creative thinking abilities. PSS learning model (N-Gain 46%, less effective); IPS learning model (N-Gain 60% is quite effective; CPS learning model (N-Gain 71% effective). The order of effectiveness of the three learning models is CPS, IPS, PSS.; 2) Problem-based learning models are generally effective in improving students’ creative thinking abilities with different academic abilities. The percentage of effectiveness of the three models is the PSS is ineffective (20.13%) or less effective (34.38%); IPS is quite effective (62.50%); CPS is effective (43.75%). Based on the study's results, it can be concluded that 1) Problem-based learning models (PSS, CPS, IPS) can improve students' creative thinking skills. 2) The CPS is most effective in improving students' creative thinking skills.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call