Abstract
This study analyzes the use of discretion and impunity in the management of state finances during the COVID-19 pandemic. The results showed that regulation No. 1 of 2020 which became law No. 2 of 2020 is contrary to the principle of the rule of law because it abolishes criminal and civil sanctions for officials who harm the state. This has implications for the state budget. Normative research with data collection from library sources was used in this study. Overall, this study concludes that discretion and impunity in the management of state finances during the COVID-19 pandemic are contrary to the principles of the rule of law and have an impact on the state budget.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
