Problem aspects of verifying declarations and monitoring the lifestyle

Abstract

In modern conditions, when the country suffers from a full-scale invasion from the outside, there is no less an enemy within it - corruption. An important factor contributing to the fight against corruption is society, which can help anti-corruption authorities in the fight against such a negative phenomenon as corruption with the help of various means. Among such means, declaration and monitoring of the way of life of officials stand out. This paper will be devoted to highlighting the problem of the imperfection of the current legislation in terms of monitoring the lifestyle of certain categories of persons. Thus, it will be pointed out the problematic decision of the CCU, due to which it was necessary to change the approach to the verification of declarations and lifestyle monitoring. The consequences of this decision will also be analyzed. Thus, according to the current legislation, there should be three separate lifestyle monitoring procedures: the general procedure, the procedure for monitoring the lifestyle of NACP employees, and the procedure for monitoring the lifestyle of judges. However, currently only two orders are in operation: general and for employees of NACP. According to the legislation, the procedure for lifestyle monitoring and full verification of the declarations of judges and judges of the ccu is adopted by agreement with the High Council of Justice. Back in 2021, NACP appealed to the High Council of Justice, but was refused. Therefore, since that time, the order was never adopted. The purpose of the study is to analyze the participation of the public in the use of such anti-corruption tools as the declaration of persons authorized to perform the functions of the state or local self-government, monitoring their lifestyle, and the ways of their interaction with the NACP, as well as to identify shortcomings in the legislation and develop proposals for their elimination.