Abstract

PurposeComputer-aided navigation is widely used in ENT surgery. The position of a surgical instrument is shown in the CT/MR images of the patient and can thus be a good support for the surgeon. The accuracy is highly dependent on the registration done prior to surgery. A microscope and a probe can both be used for registration and navigation, depending on the surgical intervention. A navigation system typically only reports the fiducial registration error after paired-point registration. However, the target registration error (TRE)—a measurement for the accuracy in the surgical area—is much more relevant. The aim of this work was to compare the performance of a microscope relative to a conventional probe-based approach with different registration methods.MethodsIn this study, optical tracking was used to register a plastic skull to its preoperative CT images with paired-point registration. Anatomical landmarks and skin-affixed markers were used as fiducials and targets. With both microscope and probe, four different registration methods were evaluated based on their TREs at 10 targets. For half of the experiments, a surface registration and/or external fiducials were used additionally to paired-point registration to study their influence to accuracy.ResultsOverall, probe registration leads to a smaller TRE (1.69 pm 0.74,hbox {mm}) than registration with a microscope (2.19 pm 0.94,hbox {mm}). Additional surface registration does not result in better accuracy of navigation for microscope and probe. The lowest mean TRE for both pointers can be achieved with paired-point registration only and radiolucent markers.ConclusionOur experiments showed that a probe used for registration and navigation achieves lower TREs compared using a microscope. Neither additional surface registration nor additional fiducials on an external reference element are necessary for improved accuracy of navigated ENT surgery on a plastic skull.

Highlights

  • Clinical navigation systems are commonly used for ENT interventions

  • Depending on the surgical intervention, different pointers can be used for navigation; for example, a microscope is required at the lateral

  • Group A defines the registration with the probe and group B the registration with the microscope

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Clinical navigation systems are commonly used for ENT interventions At critical regions, they are supporting the surgeon by realizing the exact positions of a pointer inside the patients’ body on the CT/MR images. Austria skull base to support the surgeon with detailed images of the surgical area In this case, the pointer can be the microscope or a probe. Skin-affixed markers are known to be prone to changes of the skin according to different hydration statuses or effects of muscle relaxing agents and are to be used with caution [3]. Those aspects can be avoided if bone-implanted fiducials are used, but because of the inva-

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call