Abstract

PurposeThe target registration error (TRE) is a crucial parameter to estimate the potential usefulness of computer-assisted navigation intraoperatively. Both image-to-patient registration on base of rigid-body registration and TRE prediction methods are available for spatially isotropic and anisotropic data. This study presents a thorough validation of data obtained in an experimental operating room setting with CT images.MethodsOptical tracking was used to register a plastic skull, an anatomic specimen, and a volunteer to their respective CT images. Plastic skull and anatomic specimen had implanted bone fiducials for registration; the volunteer was registered with anatomic landmarks. Fiducial localization error, fiducial registration error, and total target error (TTE) were measured; the TTE was compared to isotropic and anisotropic error prediction models. Numerical simulations of the experiment were done additionally.ResultsThe user localization error and the TTE were measured and calculated using predictions, both leading to results as expected for anatomic landmarks and screws used as fiducials. TRE/TTE is submillimetric for the plastic skull and the anatomic specimen. In the experimental data a medium correlation was found between TRE and target localization error (TLE). Most of the predictions of the application accuracy (TRE) fall in the 68% confidence interval of the measured TTE. For the numerically simulated data, a prediction of TTE was not possible; TRE and TTE show a negligible correlation.ConclusionExperimental application accuracy of computer-assisted navigation could be predicted satisfactorily with adequate models in an experimental setup with paired-point registration of CT images to a patient. The experimental findings suggest that it is possible to run navigation and prediction of navigation application accuracy basically defined by the spatial resolution/precision of the 3D tracker used.

Highlights

  • Navigation is widely used in ENT surgery to support the surgeon

  • The experimental findings suggest that it is possible to run navigation and prediction of navigation application accuracy basically defined by the spatial resolution/precision of the 3D tracker used

  • The mean value ± standard deviation over all registrations is given in mm (3, 5, 7, 9-point registration for plastic skull and anatomic specimen and 3- and 5-point registration for the volunteer)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A crucial part of the whole navigation process is the registration of the patient to the preoperative CT/MRI images. Homologous points on the patient and in the image (fiducials) are used to find the rigid transformation between them. Fiducials on the surface of the patient are used for registration, but the operating area is inside the head. Tracking errors and errors in localizing fiducials on the patient or in the images prohibit perfect navigation. The TRE [6] allows surgeons estimating the accuracy of navigation inside the patient at the surgical target zone. This is a good measure for the theoretical clinical application accuracy of a navigation system. Knowing TRE before surgery is a key component for a reliable intraoperative use of information

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call