Abstract
This paper aims to examine the pattern of male out-migration and explains the distribution of households according to number of male migrants aged fifteen and above. The suitability of proposed model is tested with primary data collected from remote and semi-urban areas of Varanasi, 2012. Findings highlight that the average number of clusters from the remote households is higher and the average number of individuals per clusters is lower in comparison to the semi-urban villages. The average number of migrants per household has increased with increasing size of households in the remote as well as in semi-urban villages. The average number of migrants per household is higher among upper caste followed by middle caste, Muslims and scheduled caste from the study area. Average number of migrants per household has increased over six times in the low economic status of the households. In the medium and high economic status of the households, average number of migrants per household is found to be around three and two times more respectively, over the last three decades. The increasing average number of migrants per household portray that an increasing propensity of adult male migration from the study area. Over 2.7 times increase in the average number of migrants per household may be primarily due to increasing man-land ratio in the absence of relative growth in employment opportunities. Thus, the existing imbalances in demand and supply of gainful employment opportunities in the region may be the key to continuously increasing the number of migrants per households from the region.
Highlights
A number of attempts have been made during the past few decades to explain the migration process through migration models [4], [7], [2], [5], [6], [16], [17], [1], [10], [12], [3], [22], . [23] most of these previous researchers have focussed on aggregate variation in movement in relation to various social, demographic and spatial characteristics
The suitability of proposed model is tested with primary data collected from remote and semi-urban areas of Varanasi, 2012
Findings highlight that the average number of clusters from the remote households is higher and the average number of individuals per clusters is lower in comparison to the semi-urban villages
Summary
A number of attempts have been made during the past few decades to explain the migration process through migration models [4], [7], [2], [5], [6], [16], [17], [1], [10], [12], [3], [22], . [23] most of these previous researchers have focussed on aggregate variation in movement in relation to various social, demographic and spatial characteristics. An adult male aged fifteen years and above, migrated alone to the place of destination leaving his wife and children at the place of origin Such a person maintains close links with his household in the village, sends remittances and visits the household at regular intervals of time. There is no female migration from a household Under these assumptions, he derived a distribution for the total number of migrants from a household and examined its suitability. He derived a distribution for the total number of migrants from a household and examined its suitability This model suffers from a limitation that the distribution of living children should be known. The situation in the migration process is similar to the above distribution to represent the pattern of migrants from a household
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Mathematical Journal of Interdisciplinary Sciences
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.