Abstract

This paper proposes a new probabilistic power flow method for the hybrid AC/VSC-MTDC (Voltage Source Control-Multiple Terminal Direct Current) grids, which is based on the combination of ninth-order polynomial normal transformation (NPNT) and inherited Latin hypercube sampling (ILHS) techniques. NPNT is utilized to directly handle historical records of uncertain sources to build the accurate probability model of random inputs, and ILHS is adopted to propagate the randomness from inputs to target outputs. Regardless of whether the underlying probability distribution is known or unknown, the proposed method has the ability to adaptively evaluate the sample size according to a specific operational scenario of the power systems, thus achieving a good balance between computational accuracy and speed. Meanwhile, the frequency histograms, probability distributions, and some more statistics of the results can be accurately and efficiently estimated as well. The modified IEEE 118-bus system, together with the realistic data of wind speeds and diverse consumer behaviors following irregular distributions, is used to demonstrate the effectiveness and superiority of the proposed method.

Highlights

  • The Voltage Source Converter based Multiple Terminal Direct Current (VSC-MTDC) technique has become the most feasible solution to the integration of remotely located large wind farms (WFs), as it can effectively support the AC grid, facilitate the integration of fluctuant wind power, and improve the transfer efficiency [1]

  • With more and more WFs integrated into AC grids by using VSC-MTDC, the fluctuant wind power will significantly increase the stochastic nature of the power system, further exacerbating the operational condition of the hybrid AC/VSC-MTDC grids [2]

  • probability density function (PDF) of probabilistic power flow (PPF) results are required in an operational scenario, a more strict convergence target can be set for the proposed method ninth-order polynomial normal transformation (NPNT)-inherited Latin hypercube sampling (ILHS) (like NPNT-ILHS(a)) to achieve the satisfactory accuracy while keeping the relatively low computational cost

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The Voltage Source Converter based Multiple Terminal Direct Current (VSC-MTDC) technique has become the most feasible solution to the integration of remotely located large wind farms (WFs), as it can effectively support the AC grid, facilitate the integration of fluctuant wind power, and improve the transfer efficiency [1]. The probability model of input variables needs to be accurately built based on the historical records, regardless of whether the underlying distribution is known or unknown; the probabilistic method holds a good balance between computation accuracy and speed; the mean, standard deviation, frequency histogram, and even the PDF of output results obtained from PPF calculation can be comprehensively available. Unlike conventional MCS, the size of CLHS cannot be increased by generating additional samples, since the new sample set (including the original and the additional sample set) cannot preserve the stratification properties that make CLHS so effective [22] This naturally results in a problem regarding how many samples are required for PPF of the complex hybrid AC/DC grids with diverse operational scenarios.

VSC Model
A model of aofVoltage
Ninth-Order Polynomial Normal Transformation for Random Inputs Modeling
Polynomial Coefficients Evaluation for Modeling the Uncertainties
Correlation Coefficients Estimation in Standard Normal Space
Inherited Latin Hypercube Sampling Technique
Conventional Latin Hypercube Sampling Technique
Sampling:
Inherited Latin Hypercube Sampling Design
Procedure:
Case Studies
Performance Evaluation on Probability Model of Random Inputs
Frequency
Performance Evaluation of Proposed PPF Method
Comparison with the CLHS Method
4%. Method
The values of FHSIs of DCofbus obtained by using
Comparison of PPF Methods with Using Different Input Probability Models
Methods of Building the Input
Methods of Building the
Methods
PPF Methods
Comparison with other PPF Methods
Method
Performance Evaluation with Different Correlation Levels
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call