Private and Public Sector Differences in Adverse Incidents and Restrictive Practices: Factors That Predicted Service Sector in a National Sample of Forensic Psychiatric Inpatients

Abstract

Forensic mental health services play a key role in the diversion, treatment, rehabilitation, and supervision of offenders with mental health problems in Europe. Private sector providers are increasingly commissioned to provide secure care for service users. Questions have been raised about the effectiveness of the private sector providers. A sample of 229 patients from low, and medium secure psychiatric services in the United Kingdom was analyzed to determine differences in restrictive practices, adverse service user incidents, and service user characteristics between service users admitted to private sector or publicly funded hospitals. Service users with a diagnosis of a personality disorder, and those who had multiple psychiatric diagnoses were disproportionately placed in the private sector. Greater prevalence of seclusion, physical restraint, verbal aggression toward staff, physical violence toward staff and other service users, property damage, and self-harm were observed in private sector service users. Further attention is warranted around the decision-making processes that allocate people to private versus publicly funded care, potential sources of bias in admission characteristics should be taken into account when interpreting poorer clinical outcomes in the private sector.