Abstract

Social dissatisfaction with the administration of justice in Poland is closely related to excessive delays in resolving civil disputes. However, this disadvantage is only an outcome of complex and outdated regulations. In recent years, the Polish legislator has introduced various new solutions which were supposed to modernize the civil procedure and accelerate the speed of proceedings. Some of them resemble the medieval ius commune procedure features. The main purpose of this paper is to identify them and discuss their reasonableness as well as their usefulness in modern civil proceedings from the historical perspective. The conducted research leads to the conclusion that the described reform efforts are contrary to the basic civil procedure principles developed over the years, such as orality, publicity or immediacy, and cannot contribute to the expected positive effect in terms of ensuring the right of access to court without undue delay. On the contrary, the efficiency of the proceedings can only be guaranteed by open and direct communication between a court and the parties, simplified procedural rules and increased number of court staff.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call