Abstract
Priority effects can be used to promote target species during restoration. Early planting can provide an advantage over later-arriving species, increasing abundance of these early-arrivers in restored communities. However, we have limited knowledge of the indirect impacts of priority effects in restoration. In particular, we do not understand how priority effects impact non-target species. Of particular conservation concern is how these priority effects influence establishment by non-native species. We use a field-based mesocosm experiment to explore the impacts of priority effects on both target and non-target species in California grasslands. Specifically, we seeded native grasses and forbs, manipulating order of arrival by planting them at the same time, planting forbs one year before grasses, planting grasses one year before forbs, or planting each functional group alone. While our study plots were tilled and weeded for the first year, the regional species pool was heavily invaded. We found that, while early-arrival of native grasses did not promote establishment of non-native species, giving priority to native forbs ultimately left our restoration mesocosms vulnerable to invasion by non-native species. This suggests that, in some cases, establishment of non-native species may be an unintended consequence of using priority treatments as a restoration tool.
Highlights
Community assembly, the process by which species come together to form a community, is an important driver of community structure and function [1]
Seeded grasses were significantly more abundant when they arrived in the first year of planting, regardless of whether they were seeded alone (G), seeded along with forbs (GF), or seeded a year before forbs (GtF), while they were significantly less abundant when seeded a year after forbs (GtF v FtG: p < 0.0001; G v FtG: p < 0.0001; GF v FtG: p = 0.0005)
(A) native grasses, native forbs, (C) exotic across grasses forbscover seeded at the same timeof(GF), grasses seeded(B)
Summary
The process by which species come together to form a community, is an important driver of community structure and function [1]. Soil legacy effects [5,6]. While these dynamics play a role in driving the composition of incipient communities, they can have long-lasting effects, potentially impacting community trajectories well into the future [7,8]. Restoration practitioners have begun harnessing the concepts of community assembly to facilitate successful restoration outcomes. Practitioners can use priority effects to enhance desirable but difficult-to-establish species by planting them early [9]. As little as two-weeks of a head start has been shown to significantly enhance a species representation in a community in some cases [10,11]
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have