Abstract

Background: Metabolism is the process of nutrient uptake and conversion, and executed by the metabolic network. Its evolutionary precursors most likely originated in non-enzymatic chemistry. To be exploitable in a Darwinian process that forms a metabolic pathway, non-enzymatic reactions need to form a chemical network that produces advantage-providing metabolites in a single, life compatible condition. In a hypothesis-generating, large-scale experiment, we recently screened iron and sulfur-rich solutions, and report that upon the formation of sulfate radicals, Krebs cycle intermediates establish metabolism-like non-enzymatic reactivity. A challenge to our results claims that the results obtained by liquid chromatography-selective reaction monitoring (LC-SRM) would not be reproducible by nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy (1H-NMR). Methods: This study compared the application of the two techniques to the relevant samples. Results: We detect hundred- to thousand-fold differences in the specific limits of detection between LC-SRM and 1H-NMR to detect Krebs cycle intermediates. Further, the use of 1H-NMR was found generally problematic to characterize early metabolic reactions, as Archean-sediment typical iron concentrations cause paramagnetic signal suppression. Consequently, we selected non-enzymatic Krebs cycle reactions that fall within the determined technical limits. We confirm that these proceed unequivocally as evidenced by both LC-SRM and 1H-NMR. Conclusions: These results strengthen our previous conclusions about the existence of unifying reaction conditions that enables a series of co-occurring metabolism-like non-enzymatic Krebs cycle reactions. We further discuss why constraints applying to metabolism disentangle concentration from importance of any reaction intermediates, and why evolutionary precursors to metabolic pathways must have had much lower metabolite concentrations compared to modern metabolic networks. Research into the chemical origins of life will hence miss out on the chemistry relevant for metabolism if its focus is restricted solely to highly abundant and unreactive metabolites, including when it ignores life-compatibility of the reaction conditions as an essential constraint in enzyme evolution.

Highlights

  • Metabolism is the biological process of nutrient uptake and biochemical conversion in order to enable cell growth and survival

  • We identify the most likely source of discrepancy when comparing 1H-NMR and liquid chromatography-selective reaction monitoring (LC-SRM) experiments in detecting non-enzymatic metabolic reactions

  • The two techniques possess substantially different limits of detection (LOD) for TCA cycle intermediates, by a factor of at least one hundred- to one thousand-fold, even in samples of low complexity and when any matrix-dependent signal suppression is largely ruled out. This difference has the potential to limit the ability of 1H-NMR to achieve a comparable depth in the characterisation of early metabolic chemical reaction networks when compared to LC-SRM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Metabolism is the biological process of nutrient uptake and biochemical conversion in order to enable cell growth and survival In cells, this task obliges a large biochemical system, the metabolic network, which interconverts the available metabolites through a series of connected enzymatic and non-enzymatic reactions[1,2]. The metabolic network of every living cell contains many important metabolites of low concentration that are reactive and quickly turned over These reactions assemble in a tightly interconnected, biochemical network of a few hundred reactions co-occurring in, broadly speaking, a single chemical condition[3,4,5]. We selected non-enzymatic Krebs cycle reactions that fall within the determined technical limits We confirm that these proceed unequivocally as evidenced by both LC-SRM and 1H-NMR. Research into the chemical origins of life will miss out on the chemistry relevant for metabolism if its focus is restricted solely to highly abundant and unreactive metabolites, including when it ignores life-compatibility of the reaction conditions as an essential constraint in enzyme evolution

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call