Abstract

Mitral regurgitation (MR) remains the second dominant defect in the structure of valvular cardiac diseases [1]. It affects more than 2 million people in the USA. Basic causes are classified as degenerative (with valve prolapse) and ischemic (due to ischemic heart disease) in advanced countries or rheumatic ones (in developing countries) [2, 3]. Alone radical method of MR treatment is surgical correction through mitral valve repair (MVRe) or replacement (MVR) yielding definitely higher survival percentage and improvement of heart failure (HF) class comparing to pharmacotherapy [4]. Evolution of approaches to the management of non-ischemic MR passed through some stages, starting from predominantly MVR to organ-preserving approaches like plastic repair [5]. In the prospective single-center study the results of treatment of 72 patients with primary MR (PMR) who were subjected to mitral valve replacement (MVR) or plastic mitral valve repair (MVRe) performed in the Department of cardiac surgery affiliated with Lviv regional clinical hospital (Ukraine) since October, 2013 till February, 2016 were analyzed. The conclusions of performed study are the following: 1) Key direct cause of MR is the chordal rupture of MV cusps, etiological factor in the majority of advanced countries is degenerative changes in contrast to rheumatic changes in the developing countries. 2) Principal method of MR surgical correction in out center is MVR, though the preferable global trend is MVRe. 3) Complications and lethality percentages in this study were higher among the patients from MVR group. Improvement of HF class according to NYHA was more evident in the MVRe group. This corresponds to results of other studies and guidelines that recommend MVRe as optional method for MR correction

Highlights

  • Mitral regurgitation (MR) remains the second dominant defect in the structure of valvularPRIMARY MITRAL REGURGITATION AND RESULTS OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT INA PROSPECTIVE STUDYBesides ejection fraction (EF) measurement using Simpson method and Teicholz method so-called “effective” (Dopcardiac diseases [1].Оleksiy Myshakivskyy pler-derived) EF of LV was It affects more than 2 mil-Cardiac surgeon determined

  • MVRe comparing to MVR yields better results and among patients with severe organic MV degenmitral regurgitation (MR) diminished mortality down to 70%

  • Long-term studies showed that comparing to medical treatment early surgical intervention on MV among patients with prolapse of cusps was associated with significantly lower risk of the future death due to cardiac causes or HF and longer life expectancy [4]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Mitral regurgitation (MR) remains the second dominant defect in the structure of valvularPRIMARY MITRAL REGURGITATION AND RESULTS OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT INA PROSPECTIVE STUDYBesides ejection fraction (EF) measurement using Simpson method and Teicholz method so-called “effective” (Dopcardiac diseases [1].Оleksiy Myshakivskyy pler-derived) EF of LV was It affects more than 2 mil-Cardiac surgeon determined. Mitral regurgitation (MR) remains the second dominant defect in the structure of valvular. PRIMARY MITRAL REGURGITATION AND RESULTS OF SURGICAL MANAGEMENT IN. Оleksiy Myshakivskyy pler-derived) EF of LV was . The essence of this lion people in the USA. Lviv Regional Clinical Hospital that LV stroke volume (SV) is ative (with valve prolapse) and Danylo Halytsky Lviv National Medical University od and LV end-diastolic volume disease) in advanced countries. Alone radical method of MR treatment is surgical correction through mitral valve repair (MVRe) or replacement (MVR) yielding definitely higher survival percentage and improvement of heart failure (HF) class comparing to pharmacotherapy [4]

Objectives
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call