Abstract

Objective: Primary Malignant Melanoma (PMM) arising from the digestive, respiratory or genitourinary tract is extremely rare. Rectal PMM accounts for less than 1% of all melanomas; it is often advanced at initial presentation with a poor prognosis with a 5-year survival below 20%. Treatment of this particular disease is still debated with weak evidence that aggressive surgery may lead to a better outcome. The objective of the present paper is to descibe a case of PMM and review the published literature on the treatment of such extremely rare condition. Methods: A 78 years old man presenting mild anal bleeding underwent a colonoscopy which showed a centimetric mass in the posterior wall of the rectum, less than 1 cm above the pectinea line. Biopsy revealed amelanotic malignant melanoma infiltrating the submucosa. Preoperative assessment revealed no distant metastases and no nodal involvement. Abdominoperineal resection (APR) with total mesorectal excision and iliac nodes sampling was performed. Results: the patient is alive and disease-free after 48 months from diagnosis. According to a literature review, APR with or without intra abdominal pelvic lymph node dissection represents a more radical approach in patients seeking curative options. However, some series suggest that wide local excision (WLE) may have similar survival outcomes but seems to be burdened with a higher rate of local recurrences. Conclusions: Our experience confirms that treatment recommendations are not standardized and tend to be individualized. An aggressive surgical approach may be justified in patient with a long life expectancy accepting a demolitive surgery and a definitive colonostomy.

Highlights

  • Early studies suggest that aggressive treatment of primary anorectal melanoma with Abdominoperineal resection (APR) is associated with a better prognosis [8, 9], other authors experienced analog survival results with a wide local excision (WLE) of the primary tumor site [3, 7, 10, 11, 12]

  • Conflicting findings are described by other study groups, as shown in a recent report of 15 patients affected by anorectal melanoma in which APR seemed to offer no advantage in survival and local relapse when compared to WLE [11]

  • Authors favoring WLE tend to advocate the usefulness of nodal prophylactic dissection in Primary Malignant Melanoma (PMM); in our opinion nodal involvement of primary rectal melanoma can be difficult to diagnose preoperatively given the limits of radiological instruments (CT, MRI, endo-US) toward detection of early or micro metastasis

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Primary anorectal melanoma is a rare neoplasm, accounting for 24% of mucosal melanomas, 4% of all anal tumors and less than 1% of all melanomas [1, 2]. Small primary rectal melanomas are generally asymptomatic, and the lack of early presenting symptoms can be responsible of a delayed diagnosis; uncommonly they can cause mild anal discomfort and bleeding. The treatment of primary rectal melanoma is still debated; it can range from local excision to abdomino-perineal resection (APR). Early studies suggest that aggressive treatment of primary anorectal melanoma with APR is associated with a better prognosis [8, 9], other authors experienced analog survival results with a wide local excision (WLE) of the primary tumor site [3, 7, 10, 11, 12]. Procedure) with iliac lymphnodes dissection and definitive pathology confirmed the presence of a primitive malignant amelanotic melanoma of the lower rectum (Fig.1) focally infiltrating the submucosa with no lymphatic invasion of the mesorectal and internal iliac stations (T2N0M0).

Findings
Discussion
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.