Prevention of atrial fibrillation by inter-atrial septum pacing guided by electrophysiological testing, in patients with delayed interatrial conduction.

Abstract

Interatrial septum (IAS) pacing seems efficient in synchronizing atrial depolarization in patients (pts) with delayed inter-atrial conduction, but its clinical role in preventing atrial tachyarrhythmias is still debated. This study was conducted in order to evaluate the clinical efficacy of IAS pacing guided by pace mapping of the IAS, as an alternative treatment modality in pts with drug refractory paroxysmal atrial fibrillation (PAF). We evaluated 29 pts (13 male, 16 female, 60 +/- 11 years), with drug refractory PAF, normal sinus node function and prolonged inter-atrial conduction time (P wave 142 +/- 10 ms). Multipolar catheters were inserted and the electrograms from the high right atrium (HRA) and proximal, middle and distal coronary sinus (CS) were recorded. The IAS was paced from multiple sites. The site of IAS where the timing between HRA and distal CS was <20 ms was considered the most suitable for synchronizing the atria. This site was found to be superior to the CS os. near the fossa ovalis in all pts. An active fixation atrial lead was positioned at this site and a standard lead was placed in the right ventricle. During IAS pacing, the P wave duration decreased significantly to 107 +/- 15 ms (P<0.001). At implant, the atrial sensing was 2.3 +/- 0.7 mV, the atrial pacing threshold was 0.95 +/- 0.15 V (0.5 ms) and the impedance was 760 +/- 80 Ohm. We evaluated the pts during four periods of 3 months duration each. The first period (control) was before pacemaker implantation, while the pts were under antiarrhythmic treatment. During the subsequent two periods, we evaluated the clinical efficacy of IAS pacing to prevent PAF recurrences, in AAT (75 bpm) and AAIR (75-140 bpm) mode, with random selection of the order and after discontinuation of antiarrhythmic treatment. During the fourth period, the same AAIR mode was assessed, but antiarrhythmic drugs were also administered. We compared the arrhythmia free interval among the four periods. The proportion of atrial paced beats in AAIR pacing mode plus antiarrhythmics was significantly higher compared with the drug-free period in AAIR mode (57 +/- 9% and 49 +/- 9% respectively, P=0017) and with AAT pacing mode (44 +/- 10%,(, P<0.001). In AAT mode, the arrhythmia free interval was 24.2 +/- 5.1 days, while it was 26.2 +/- 5.7 days in AAIR mode. These intervals did not differ significantly from the pre-implantation period (24.1 +/- 6.3 days). The arrhythmia free interval in AAIR pacing in combination with antiarrhythmic drug therapy was 38.7 +/- 8.1 days and this was significantly longer than the previous periods (P<0.05). Atrial septal pacing in combination with antiarrhythmic drug therapy reduced the incidence of PAF in pts with prolonged inter-atrial conduction times. Pace mapping of the IAS is an attractive technique to assess the shortest atrial activation time between HRA and distal CS. Whether placement of the atrial lead based on the shortest HRA--distal CS time is the best place in the IAS to prevent PAF still remains to be proven.