Abstract
New commercially available Human Papillomavirus (HPV) assays need to be evaluated in a variety of cervical screening settings. Cobas HPV Test (cobas) is a real-time PCR-based assay allowing for separate detection of HPV genotypes 16 and 18 and a bulk of 12 other high-risk genotypes. The aim of the present study, Horizon, was to assess the prevalence of high-risk HPV infections in an area with a high background risk of cervical cancer, where women aged 23–65 years are targeted for cervical screening. We collected 6,258 consecutive cervical samples from the largest cervical screening laboratory in Denmark serving the whole of Copenhagen. All samples were stored in SurePath media. In total, 5,072 samples were tested with cobas, Hybrid Capture 2 High Risk HPV DNA test (HC2) and liquid-based cytology. Of these, 27% tested positive on cobas. This proportion decreased by age, being 43% in women aged 23–29 years and 10% in women aged 60–65 years. HC2 assay was positive in 20% of samples, and cytology was abnormal (≥ atypical squamous cells of undetermined significance) for 7% samples. When only samples without recent abnormalities were taken into account, 24% tested positive on cobas, 19% on HC2, and 5% had abnormal cytology. The proportion of positive cobas samples was higher than in the ATHENA trial. The age-standardized cobas positivity vs. cytology abnormality was 3.9 in our study and 1.7 in ATHENA. If in Copenhagen the presently used cytology would be replaced by cobas in women above age 30 years, an extra 11% of women would based on historical data be expected to have a positive cobas test without an underlying cervical intraepithelial lesion grade 3 or worse. Countries with a high prevalence of HPV infections should therefore proceed to primary HPV-based cervical screening with caution.
Highlights
The higher sensitivity for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing compared with cytology [1] could protect more women from developing cervical cancer [2,3]
HPV DNA testing has been implemented into primary cervical screening e.g. in the USA, Mexico, and the Spanish region of Castile and Leon, whereas the Netherlands made a recommendation for primary screening in 2011
Between the 5,072 samples available for testing with cobas, and the 1,186 samples that were excluded from the study, there were no significant differences in the distributions by age group (x2 = 11.2, df = 6, P = 0.084), cytology outcome (x2 = 3.58, df = 4, P = 0.466), or HC2 outcome (x2 = 1.04, df = 1, P = 0.308)
Summary
The higher sensitivity for high-grade cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) of Human Papillomavirus (HPV) testing compared with cytology [1] could protect more women from developing cervical cancer [2,3]. The HC2 assay has been extensively studied all over the world in randomized controlled trials and numerous split-sample studies [1,4,5]. Because of this, it is widely considered a standard HPV DNA assay [6]. More HPV assays have become commercially available. The designs of these assays differ from that of HC2 in terms of the targeted viral genes and of the testing methods
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have