Abstract
PurposeThe study objectives were to 1) examine what methodological approaches have been used to determine adverse childhood experiences (ACE) prevalence and 2) determine the prevalence of different ACEs. MethodsA scoping review was conducted on 2009–2020 articles focused on persons 17 years and younger, highlighting screening and surveillance of ACEs, and evaluating the psychometrics of ACE screening tools. ResultsA descriptive analysis categorized results of 27 articles into key methodological themes (i.e., study design, self vs. caregiver reporting, location/setting). Majority of the studies were cross-sectional (81.5%), self-reporting (74.1%) and focused on neglect, bullying/victimization and violence. There were 26 unique instruments used to assess ACEs. The prevalence for ACEs reported in the literature varied widely based on factors such as the type of ACEs examined, instrument, self vs. caregiver reporting, age group, and setting. ConclusionSynthesis of our findings highlights the need for standardization in ACE measurement as they contribute to variations in ACE prevalence estimations and understanding the overall burden ACEs have on a population. Recommendations for improving ACE measurement among U.S. children and adolescents were provided.
Published Version
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a call