Abstract

In this work, a comparison of Soxhlet extraction (LPSE–SOX), percolation (LPSE–PE) and pressurized liquid extraction (PLE) for the recovery of carotenoid-rich extracts from pressed palm fiber (PPF) was carried out in terms of yield, carotenoid profile and economic viability to evaluate the methods’ industrial applicability. An optimization study was performed for each extraction technique with ethanol at a solvent/feed ratio of 20. The independent variables were temperature (35–55°C), pressure (0.1–8MPa) and flow rate (1.6, 2.4g/min). The results showed that the global extraction yield obtained using LPSE–SOX (96±4mg extract/g PPF d.b.) after 6h was higher than that obtained using LPSE–PE (74±5mg extract/g PPF d.b., 35°C, 2.4g/min) or PLE (44±3mg extract/g PPF d.b., 55°C, 4MPa, 2.4g/min) after dynamic extraction time of 17min under optimized conditions. On the other hand, the carotenoid yield obtained using PLE (305±18μg α-carotene/g extract and 713±46μg β-carotene/g extract) was higher than the obtained by LPSE–SOX (142±13μg α-carotene/g extract and 317±46μg β-carotene/g extract). PLE technique showed the highest selectivity for carotenoids than LPSE techniques. The lowest cost of manufacturing (COM) were obtained for LPSE–PE and PLE with values of US$13.4 and US$29.2/kg extract for a 0.5m3 vessel capacity.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.