Prescription of lipid-lowering therapy, LDLc control, and risk of MACE in patients after ST-elevation myocardial infarction in Mexico

Abstract

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements None. Background/Introduction Optimal control of low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDLc) has been demonstrated to reduce cardiovascular event rates after ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). However, real-world data shows that a low proportion of patients achieve LDLc targets. Furthermore, the association of LDLc levels and major cardiovascular adverse events (MACE) in post-STEMI patients is limited in developing countries. Purpose In this study, we aimed to assess the prescription patterns of lipid-lowering therapies, LDLc control, and their impact on the risk of MACE after STEMI in Mexico. Methods We conducted a prospective observational study of patients with STEMI. LDLc levels and prescriptions of lipid-lowering therapy were assessed during the first scheduled visit following STEMI hospital discharge. LDLc control was determined in accordance with the 2023 European Society of Cardiology Acute Coronary Syndrome Guidelines, which recommend achieving LDLc levels below 55 mg/dL for secondary prevention. Patients were categorized as controlled (if LDLc <55 mg/dL) and not controlled (if LDLc >55 mg/dL) and were followed for a median of 4.5 years to evaluate the rate of MACE, including cardiovascular death, cardiogenic shock, recurrent MI, and heart failure. Results We included 447 patients with a mean age of 57.87 (± 10.5 years), predominantly male (84.5%). Hypertension (43.8%), smoking (41.1%), type 2 diabetes mellitus (33.5%), obesity (26.6%), and dyslipidemia (21.4%) were highly prevalent. The median LDLc level in the total population was 65.4 mg/dL (IQR 49.2- 87.7). Among these, 34% (152) were considered controlled, while 66% (295) were not. Baseline clinical characteristics did not significantly differ among the groups. Prescription of high-intensity statins reached 94.7%, and ezetimibe and PCSK-9i were used in 1.8% and 0.4% of cases, respectively. We observed no statistically significant difference (Hazard ratio: 1.03, 95% confidence interval 0.74-1.73) in the rate of MACE based on LDLc control (Fig.1). The risk of MACE was also not different based on the use of high-intensity statins. Conclusions In this real-world study of patients post-STEMI, LDLc control was achieved in just one-third of the population. While the prescription of high-intensity statins was high, combination therapy was low. We did not observe a statistically significant association with an increased long-term risk of MACE; however, we noted a higher rate of events compared with other series.