Abstract
The present article is a necessary continuation of a previously published article by this author regarding the same subject. The present study sets out on a critical approach of all the arguments and conclusions presented in the „Note regarding unitary criteria in application of Decision no. 358/2022 of the Romanian Constitutional Court and of Emergency Government Ordinance no. 71/2022”, document issued by the Prosecutors' Office attached to the High Court of Cassation and Justice - General Prosecutor's Office. It is essentially a response article to this Note. Of course, at the same time, it will offer perspectives regarding dilemmas that could arise in the thoughts of any individual who meditates upon the issue of the statute of limitations in the aftermath of Decisions no. 297/2018 and 358/2022 of the Romanian Constitutional Court.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callMore From: Analele Universitării din București Drept - Forum Juridic
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
