Abstract

To perform a systematic review and meta-analysis comparing two pre-operative transfusion regimens (conservative versus aggressive) in children with sickle cell disease(SCD) undergoing adenotonsillectomy in terms of post-operative complications, complications related to SCD and transfusion related complications. A literature review was performed through PubMed, EMBASE, Cochrane, and Ovid databases using the following phrases: (Adenotonsillectomy OR Tonsillectomy) AND (Sickle Cell Disease OR Sickle Cell Trait). Using predetermined inclusion and exclusion criteria, seven articles were selected for systemic review and two control trials were included in meta-analysis. Out of a total of 3,146 results, seven articles were selected for review and two controlled trials were included in the meta-analysis. There was no statistically significant difference in the rate of primary and secondary hemorrhage between the aggressive and conservative transfusion regimens (RR = 3.1, CI = 0.84-11.4, p-value = 0.089). The rate of sickle cell disease related complications including vaso-occlusive crisis and acute chest syndrome was also not statistically significant between the two transfusion groups (RR = 1.4, CI = 0.7-2.8, p-value = 0.339). Even though, the transfusion related complications did not reach statistical significance, there was a higher complication rate in the group receiving aggressive blood transfusion. In SCD children undergoing adenotonsillectomy, an aggressive transfusion regimen that focuses on reducing the Hemoglobin S ratio to below 30% has not been shown to be more effective in reducing post-operative complications when compared to a conservative transfusion regimen. Therefore, it is reasonable to utilize a conservative transfusion regimen, thereby reducing the transfusion-associated risks.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.