Abstract

We conducted a comparative study for the preferential CO oxidation (PROX) over supported noble metal catalysts. The CO chemisorption in the absence and presence of H 2, the O 2 chemisorption, the temperature-programmed oxidation (TPO), the temperature-programmed reduction (TPR) after O 2 chemisorption and the transmission electron microscopy (TEM) were conducted to characterize the catalysts. Commercial catalysts such as 1 wt.% Pt/γ-Al 2O 3, 0.5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3, 0.5 wt.% Rh/γ-Al 2O 3, 5 wt.% Pt/γ-Al 2O 3, 5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3, and 5 wt.% Rh/γ-Al 2O 3 were utilized. Among them, 5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3 showed the highest PROX activity. This catalyst can be considered to be promising because it can reduce the high inlet CO concentration to be less than 10 ppm at low temperatures where the reverse water–gas shift reaction can be minimized. No detectable amount of chemisorbed O 2 was measured at 373 K over 1 wt.% Pt/γ-Al 2O 3, 0.5 wt.% Rh/γ-Al 2O 3 and 5 wt.% Pt/γ-Al 2O 3. The moderate degree of CO and O 2 chemisorption at reaction temperatures appeared to be essential for the optimum PROX activity. Although 0.5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3 and 5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3 have the similar particle size distribution based on TEM analysis, the latter catalyst with smaller amount of chemisorbed CO and O 2 per Ru metal showed much better PROX activity. Based on TPO and TPR result, 0.5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3 can be oxidized at lower temperatures but can be reduced at higher temperatures compared with 5 wt.% Ru/γ-Al 2O 3. Therefore, the easily reducible Ru species can give us the better PROX activity over a wide reaction temperature for Ru catalysts.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call