Abstract

Provider payment mechanisms (PPMs) are important to the universal health coverage (UHC) agenda as they can influence healthcare provider behaviour and create incentives for health service delivery, quality and efficiency. Therefore, when designing PPMs, it is important to consider providers’ preferences for PPM characteristics. We set out to uncover senior health facility managers’ preferences for the attributes of a capitation payment mechanism in Kenya. We use a discrete choice experiment and focus on four capitation attributes, namely, payment schedule, timeliness of payments, capitation rate per individual per year and services to be paid by the capitation rate. Using a Bayesian efficient experimental design, choice data were collected from 233 senior health facility managers across 98 health facilities in seven Kenyan counties. Panel mixed multinomial logit and latent class models were used in the analysis. We found that capitation arrangements with frequent payment schedules, timelier disbursements, higher payment rates per individual per year and those that paid for a limited set of health services were preferred. The capitation rate per individual per year was the most important attribute. Respondents were willing to accept an increase in the capitation rate to compensate for bundling a broader set of health services under the capitation payment. In addition, we found preference heterogeneity across respondents and latent classes. In conclusion, these attributes can be used as potential targets for interventions aimed at configuring capitation to achieve UHC.

Highlights

  • Universal health coverage (UHC) has been reemphasized by Sustainable Development Goal 3.8 (United Nations, 2018)

  • We found that capitation arrangements with frequent payment schedules, timelier disbursements, higher payment rates per individual per year and those that paid for a limited set of health services were preferred

  • 63.52% worked in health facilities that were receiving capitation payments

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Universal health coverage (UHC) has been reemphasized by Sustainable Development Goal 3.8 (United Nations, 2018). UHC calls for access to preventive, promotive, curative and rehabilitative services relative to need, quality and financial risk protection (World Health Organization, 2010). To achieve UHC, countries are reforming their health financing strategies; these reforms have focused on revenue collection and pooling functions of health financing (Mathauer et al, 2019). One area that deserves attention in the reforms is purchasing; the transfer of pooled funds to healthcare providers to deliver health services to the population (Kutzin, 2001; Figueras et al, 2005). Purchasing involves three key decisions: first, which health services are to be purchased; second, from which healthcare providers; and third, how to contract and pay the providers (PPMs) (Kutzin, 2001; Figueras et al, 2005).

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call