Predictive Role of Aortic Valve Calcium score on post-procedural outcomes and mortality after Transcatheter aortic valve replacement

Abstract

Abstract Introduction Extent of aortic valve (AV) calcium increases as degenerative aortic valve stenosis progresses. Initial studies postulated AV calcium (AVC) score to be a predictor of complications such as need for pacemaker implantation, paravalvular regurgitation and mortality after Trans-catheter Aortic valve Replacement (TAVR). However, evidence regarding the impact of AVC score as a predictor of post-procedural complications and mortality has been conflicting. Objective This study aimed to determine the prognostic impact of AVC as predictor of post-procedural outcomes and mortality in patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVR. Methods We retrospectively abstracted the records of 497 patients with severe AS who underwent TAVR between January 2016 and July 2019 at our institution. All patients underwent a non-contrast cardiac CT scan on a Siemens Somatom Definition Flash 128 slice scanner. AVC score using the Agatston method was obtained retrospectively. Patients were divided into two groups: 1) Non-severe AVC score group [women <1200 Agatston unit (AU) and men <2000 AU]; 2) Severe AV Calcium Score group [women >1200 AU and men >2000 AU]. Primary outcome was 1-year mortality. Results Among 466 patients included in the analysis, 352 patients were included severe AVC group while 114 patients were in the non-severe AVC group. Patients in the severe AVC group were older (81±8 vs 79±8 years), were predominantly males (79% vs 71%), and had less diabetes mellitus (31% vs 42%, p=0.02). Post-TAVR AV dimensionless index (0.58±0.13 vs 0.58±0.12, p=0.8) and AV mean gradient (9.5±4.9 vs 9.2±5.4 mmHg) were not statistically different between both groups. There was no statistical difference in the need for PPM (12% vs 7%, p=0.16), post-TAVR stroke (1.5% vs 0%), post-TAVR major complications (17.4% vs 10%, p=0.07), 30 day (3.7% vs 4.4%), and 1-year mortality (13.6 vs 11.4, p=0.6) between both groups. Conclusion Our study report that the severity of AVC score does not have a prognostic impact on major post-procedural outcomes and mortality after TAVR. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.