Predictive performance of corneal and lid margin sensitivity for dry eye disease: An investigator-masked, prospective, prognostic accuracy study

Abstract

PurposeTo evaluate the prognostic ability of non-contact esthesiometry corneal and lid margin sensitivity measurements in detecting symptoms and signs of dry eye disease, as defined by the global consensus TFOS DEWS II criteria. MethodsA total of 87 community residents (58 females; mean ± SD age, 53 ± 16 years) were recruited in an investigator-masked, prospective, prognostic accuracy study. Dry eye symptomology, tear film parameters, and ocular surface characteristics were evaluated in a single clinical session, and non-contact esthesiometry corneal and lid margin sensitivity measurements performed by an independent masked assessor. ResultsOverall, 49 (56%) participants fulfilled the TFOS DEWS II criteria for dry eye disease, while 57 (66%) exhibited clinical symptoms, and 67 (77%) had positive signs. The prognostic abilities of corneal and lid margin sensitivity measurements were significantly greater than chance for the detection dry eye signs (both p ≤ 0.03), but not for symptoms or overall disease diagnosis (all p > 0.10). The Youden-optimal prognostic cut-offs for corneal and lid margin sensitivity thresholds were both ≥0.8 mbar for the detection of clinical dry eye signs. Lid margin sensitivity demonstrated marginally higher predictive performance than corneal sensitivity (C-statistic, 0.688 versus 0.658), and was significantly correlated with tear film stability, corneal, conjunctival and lid wiper staining (all p < 0.05). ConclusionsCorneal and lid margin sensitivity demonstrated moderate prognostic utility for detecting clinical dry eye signs. Future research is warranted to investigate the utility of incorporating non-contact esthesiometry in the workup for dry eye disease and neurotrophic keratopathy.