Abstract

The present article addresses a generation of predictive models that assesses the thickness and length of internal defects in additive manufacturing materials. These modes use data from the application of active transient thermography numerical simulation. In this manner, the raised procedure is an ad-hoc hybrid method that integrates finite element simulation and machine learning models using different predictive feature sets and characteristics (i.e., regression, Gaussian regression, support vector machines, multilayer perceptron, and random forest). The performance results for each model were statistically analyzed, evaluated, and compared in terms of predictive performance, processing time, and outlier sensibility to facilitate the choice of a predictive method to obtain the thickness and length of an internal defect from thermographic monitoring. The best model to predictdefect thickness with six thermal features was interaction linear regression. To make predictive models for defect length and thickness, the best model was Gaussian process regression. However, models such as support vector machines also had significative advantages in terms of processing time and adequate performance for certain feature sets. In this way, the results showed that the predictive capability of some types of algorithms could allow for the detection and measurement of internal defects in materials produced by additive manufacturing using active thermography as a non-destructive test.

Highlights

  • Every industrial manufacturing process aims for the highest possible quality

  • Sensors 2020, 20, 3982 in additive manufacturing (AM), which allows for the production of customized elements, even with complex geometries with no restrictions provoked by traditional manufacturing processes [1]

  • Thermography is an non-destructive testing (NDT) that can be classified by the type of information obtained and by the method used: active thermography (AT) or passive thermography (PT)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Every industrial manufacturing process aims for the highest possible quality. Decreases in quality standards are linked to a wide range of defects that are inherent to manufacturing processes. These defects may be internal and may lead to failure and collapse of those structures, devices, or machines with additive-manufactured functional parts. There are different defect detection methods based on destructive or non-destructive testing (NDT). Thermography is an NDT that can be classified by the type of information obtained (qualitative and quantitative) and by the method used: active thermography (AT) or passive thermography (PT). We focus on AT and the detection of internal defects [3], as well as their dimensional analysis [4]

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.