Abstract

341 Background: A risk-adapted treatment for TCC may guide new trial designs for early-recognized unresponsive patients (pts). We aimed to prospectively identify early fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG)-PET/CT as a predictor of response and outcome. Methods: Pts with newly-diagnosed advanced/metastatic TCC receiving first-line chemotherapy underwent CT and FDG-PET/CT at baseline, a restaging with PET/CT after 2 cycles only (PET2), and a CT (± FDG-PET/CT) at the end of treatment and during follow up. The endpoints were PET2 metabolic response, RECIST response, progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Univariable (UVA) and multivariable (MVA) Cox models were fitted. Prespecified variables were presence of visceral metastases, nodal or soft tissue disease, and PET2 response. Results: In the time-frame 05/2010-10/2012, 31 pts with ECOG-PS 0 received a modified MVAC regimen according to Institutional protocol, every 3 weeks. After 2 cycles of MVAC, 6 patients (19.3%) had a complete (CR) and 17 (54.8%) a partial metabolic response (PR) (74% total responders; 95% CI, 55.4-88.1%), 4 had stable disease (SD), 4 progressed. Metabolic response (CR + PR) was associated with final CT response (p=0.007 at Fisher exact test). Metabolic CR was followed by a RECIST CR in all but one cases and metabolic progression at PET2 corresponded to a RECIST PD in all four patients and they all switched to second line chemotherapy. Median follow up was 18 months (IQR: 10-47). Those with metabolic response had a median (95% CI) PFS of 8 (7-11) months compared to 3 (2-5) months of patients without response (p=0.024). PET2 responders had a significant benefit in 8-month PFS (p<0.001) and 15-month OS (p=0.016 at Klein test). A significant association was observed between PET2 response and longer PFS in both UVA and MVA (p=0.027 and p=0.023, respectively). Results are limited by small numbers. Conclusions: PET2 response might confer an independent prognostic impact on PFS and OS. Results warrant a validation series, a comparison with the impact of early RECIST response as well as a detailed cost-efficacy analysis prior to devise a new strategy of first-line treatment.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.