Abstract

Leaf wetness duration (LWD) and plant diseases are strongly associated with each other. Therefore, LWD is a critical ecological variable for plant disease risk assessment. However, LWD is rarely used in the analysis of plant disease epidemiology and risk assessment because it is a non-standard meteorological variable. The application of satellite observations may facilitate the prediction of LWD as they may represent important related parameters and are particularly useful for meteorologically ungauged locations. In this study, the applicability of geostationary satellite observations for LWD prediction was investigated. GEO-KOMPSAT-2A satellite observations were used as inputs and six machine learning (ML) algorithms were employed to arrive at hourly LW predictions. The performances of these models were compared with that of a physical model through systematic evaluation. Results indicated that the LWD could be predicted using satellite observations and ML. A random forest model exhibited larger accuracy (0.82) than that of the physical model (0.79) in leaf wetness prediction. The performance of the proposed approach was comparable to that of the physical model in predicting LWD. Overall, the artificial intelligence (AI) models exhibited good performances in predicting LWD in South Korea.

Highlights

  • Leaf wetness (LW) refers to the presence of free water on the surface of a leaf [1]

  • Based on the ACC measure, random forest (RF) shows the best performance in LW prediction among all the employed models including PM that uses in-situ meteorological observations

  • These results indicate that RF and deep neural network (DNN) provide good performances in Leaf wetness duration (LWD) prediction that are comparable to that of the PM

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Leaf wetness (LW) refers to the presence of free water on the surface of a leaf [1]. Many studies have reported that LW and plant diseases resulting from bacteria and fungi are strongly correlated under temperatures favorable for infection [2,3]. The absence of a standard protocol for the measurement of LWD leads to inconsistency in its observations from different observational networks To overcome these limitations, LWD prediction models using standard meteorological variables such as air temperature (Tair), wind speed (WS), relative humidity (RH), and shortwave radiation have been suggested as alternatives for in-situ measurement [9,10,11,12]. LWD prediction models using standard meteorological variables such as air temperature (Tair), wind speed (WS), relative humidity (RH), and shortwave radiation have been suggested as alternatives for in-situ measurement [9,10,11,12] These models utilize physical mechanisms and empirical relationships to predict LW using meteorological conditions. These LWD prediction models are possible only in limited locations

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call