Abstract

Financial strength ratings (FSRs) have become more significant particularly since the recent financial crisis of 2007–2009 where rating agencies failed to forecast defaults and the downgrade of some banks. The aim of this paper is to predict Capital Intelligence banks’ financial strength ratings (FSRs) group membership using machine learning and conventional techniques. Here the authors use five different statistical techniques, namely CHAID, CART, multilayer-perceptron neural networks, discriminant analysis and logistic regression. They also use three different evaluation criteria namely average correct classification rate, misclassification cost and gains charts. The data are collected from Bankscope database for the Middle Eastern commercial banks by reference to the first decade of the 21st century. The findings show that when predicting bank FSRs during the period 2007–2009, discriminant analysis is surprisingly superior to all other techniques used in this paper. When only machine learning techniques are used, CHAID outperform other techniques. In addition, the findings highlight that when a random sample is used to predict bank FSRs, CART outperform all other techniques. The evaluation criteria have confirmed the findings and both CART and discriminant analysis are superior to other techniques in predicting bank FSRs. This has implications for Middle Eastern banks, as the authors would suggest that improving their bank FSR can improve their presence in the market.

Highlights

  • A bank’s financial strength, its risk profile, soundness and financial stability are assessed by Capital Intelligence (CI) banks’ financial strength ratings (FSRs)

  • This paper presents how Middle Eastern banks can use machine learning techniques, namely Chi-squared Automatic Interaction Detector (CHAID), Classification and Regression Trees (CART) and Multilayer-Perceptron Neural Network (MLP NN) as well as conventional techniques, namely Discriminant analysis (DA) and Logistic regression (LR) to utilise financial and non-financial indicators to predict a bank’s FSR group membership

  • Our results show that using testing/hold-out sub-sample[1], DA model has the highest average correct classification (ACC) rate of 92.2% and the lowest EMC of 0.172

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A bank’s financial strength, its risk profile, soundness and financial stability are assessed by Capital Intelligence (CI) banks’ financial strength ratings (FSRs). This incorporates factors within its internal and external environment. CI implements a specialized approach, including some qualitative and quantitative factors, in assessing a bank’s stability and assigning the appropriate banks’ FSR. This is achieved by grouping factors into the following six broad categories: ownership and governance; operating environment; management and strategies; franchise value; risk profile and financial profile. CI assesses these factors and generates a bank’s FSRs

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call