Abstract

1.Introduction Cirrhosis is the end stage of chronic liver disease. Ascites and esophageal varices (EVs) are the most common complications of portal hypertension (PHT), with an incidence of approximately 50% [1]. Since effective preventive modalities have been established for variceal haemorrhage, early detection of EVs is critical for primary prevention of bleeding. Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy (UGE) remains the gold standard for screening [2,3]. However, many studies have been conducted to predict PHT and EV with a diverse rate of accuracy. All patients with cirrhosis should undergo UGE screening to identify those at high risk of bleeding and who may benet from primary prophylaxis, since EVs are an independent predictive factor and an early complication of cirrhosis. The test should also be repeated during the follow-up of patients with cirrhosis without EVs, who are at risk of bleeding, with or without decompensation [1]. Though UGiscopy is the gold standard to screen patients for variceal development; but has has many drawbacks such as being relatively expensive, invasive, and restrictive [4]. Such a screening test should be simple, rapid, reproducible, and inexpensive [5–7]. The serum ascites albumin gradient (SAAG) is a minimally invasive method that is precise and has been described in the classication of ascitic uid(AF) based on the presence or absence of PHT [8]. Many Studies have been performed to identify non-invasive parameters for the prediction of EVs in patients newly diagnosed with cirrhosis [5]. SAAG can be considered an indirect parameter for the detection of EVs and is useful in regions where there are limitations to perform UGE. The aim of our study was to evaluate the role of SAAG in the prediction of EVs in cirrhotic patients with ascites.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call