Abstract

Private consumers and professionals may experience acute inhalation toxicity after inhaling aerosolized impregnation products. The distinction between toxic and non-toxic products is difficult to make for producers and product users alike, as there is no clearly described relationship between the chemical composition of the products and induction of toxicity. The currently accepted method for determination of acute inhalation toxicity is based on experiments on animals; it is time-consuming, expensive and causes stress for the animals. Impregnation products are present on the market in large numbers and amounts and exhibit great variety. Therefore, an alternative method to screen for acute inhalation toxicity is needed. The aim of our study was to determine if inhibition of lung surfactant by impregnation products in vitro could accurately predict toxicity in vivo in mice. We tested 21 impregnation products using the constant flow through set-up of the constrained drop surfactometer to determine if the products inhibited surfactant function or not. The same products were tested in a mouse inhalation bioassay to determine their toxicity in vivo. The sensitivity was 100%, i.e., the in vitro method predicted all the products that were toxic for mice to inhale. The specificity of the in vitro test was 63%, i.e., the in vitro method found three false positives in the 21 tested products. Six of the products had been involved in accidental human inhalation where they caused acute inhalation toxicity. All of these six products inhibited lung surfactant function in vitro and were toxic to mice.

Highlights

  • Toxicity testing is traditionally performed in experimental animals for determination of toxic and non-toxic exposure levels

  • Much of the criticism is centered on the most common parameter used by authorities: the lethal concentration 50% (LC50), i.e., the concentration in inhaled air that is lethal to 50% of the animals

  • The present study aimed to investigate whether disruption of lung surfactant (LS) function in vitro can be used as an alternative method to test for acute inhalation toxicity caused by impregnation products (IPs)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Toxicity testing is traditionally performed in experimental animals for determination of toxic and non-toxic exposure levels. This practice is out of pace with current legislative and ethical developments. The LC50 uses death as the endpoint, an outcome that is associated with substantial suffering. For this reason, it is no longer permitted to test for the LC50 in Denmark The bioassay used for testing of acute inhalation toxicity in the current study uses signs of potentially lethal lung damage observed during the experiment as an endpoint, rather than the death of the animal. Acute toxicity caused by substance inhalation can have a very steep concentration-response curve, not least for the substances in the focus of this paper: impregnation products (IPs)

Objectives
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.