Abstract

Finite-control-set model predictive current control (FCS-MPCC) has been widely investigated in the field of motor control. When the discrete motor prediction model is not obtained accurately, prediction error often occurs, which can result in improper determinations of optimal voltage vectors and can further affect the control performance of motor systems. However, papers evaluating the motor control performance employing FCS-MPCC rarely consider prediction error and its utilization to weaken the influence of inaccurate prediction model. This paper investigates in depth the prediction error caused by three influencing factors from the perspective of model accuracy—discretization method, prediction stepsize, and parameter mismatch. Firstly, the evaluation index, prediction error, is defined and its formulas considering the above three factors are derived based on interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM). Then, the theoretical analysis of prediction error is provided. Finally, experimental results of an IPMSM drive system are presented to verify and complement the theoretical analysis. Both the theoretical analysis and experimental results fully elaborate the prediction error, which can offer practical guidelines for the evaluation and improvement of motor control performance, especially for FCS-MPCC in IPMSM applications.

Highlights

  • The interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) is widely applied in many industry applications due to its high power intensity, high efficiency, high toque density, and wide speed range [1]

  • As an important control objective, the current of IPMSM is usually adjusted by utilizing vector control (VC) schemes based on proportional-integral (PI) controllers and pulse-width-modulation (PWM) strategies [2]

  • model predictive control (MPC) is usually divided into continuous-control-set MPC (CCS-MPC) and finite-control-set MPC

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The interior permanent magnet synchronous motor (IPMSM) is widely applied in many industry applications due to its high power intensity, high efficiency, high toque density, and wide speed range [1]. As an important control objective, the current of IPMSM is usually adjusted by utilizing vector control (VC) schemes based on proportional-integral (PI) controllers and pulse-width-modulation (PWM) strategies [2]. It shows good control performance but suffers from the problems of PI-parameters tuning and constraints handling. With the improvement of digital microprocessors, model predictive control (MPC), which has been successfully applied in process industry control, is becoming a potential alternative due to its obvious advantages, such as intuitive control process, fast dynamic responses, and easy inclusion of multiple control objectives and nonlinear constraints [3]. In CCS-MPC, an optimization problem is solved online to get the desired voltage vector, Energies 2018, 11, 2051; doi:10.3390/en11082051 www.mdpi.com/journal/energies

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call