Abstract

Previous modeling and experimental studies have suggested that Cu-based metal catalysts can preferentially produce metallic carbon nanotubes. Here, we explain this selectivity by separately modeling nanotube cap nucleation and nanotube growth on Cu and NixCu1–x surfaces. Cap nucleation is modeled by invoking an epitaxial lattice matching criterion and comparing the binding strengths of different cap chiralities. Nanotube growth on various catalyst surfaces was studied by calculating differences in armchair and zigzag dangling bond energies, relative chemical activity ratios, and nanotube growth rates of different nanotube chiralities. All energies associated with nanotube cap nucleation and armchair and zigzag dangling bond energies were obtained using density functional theory (DFT). We find that certain armchair and zigzag nanotube caps exhibit higher binding strengths than chiral caps, and the stability of the caps on the various surfaces decreases as Ni > Ni0.5Cu0.5 > Cu, in accordance with the respec...

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call