Abstract

This paper concerns the prediction of indoor air quality (IAQ), thermal comfort (TC) and draught risk (DR) for a virtual classroom with desk-type personalized ventilation system (PVS). This numerical study considers a coupling of the computational fluid dynamics (CFD), human thermal comfort (HTC) and building thermal behavior (BTB) numerical models. The following indexes are used: the predicted percentage of dissatisfied people (PPD) index is used for the evaluation of the TC level; the carbon dioxide (CO2) concentration in the breathing zone is used for the calculation of IAQ; and the DR level around the occupants is used for the evaluation of the discomfort due to draught. The air distribution index (ADI), based in the TC level, the IAQ level, the effectiveness for heat removal and the effectiveness for contaminant removal, is used for evaluating the performance of the personalized air distribution system. The numerical simulation is made for a virtual classroom with six desks. Each desk is equipped with one PVS with two air terminal devices located overhead and two air terminal devices located below the desktop. In one numerical simulation six occupants are used, while in another simulation twelve occupants are considered. For each numerical simulation an air supply temperature of 20 °C and 24 °C is applied. The results obtained show that the ADI value is higher for twelve persons than for six persons in the classroom and it is higher for an inlet air temperature of 20 °C than for an inlet air temperature of 24 °C. In future works, more combinations of upper and lower air terminal devices located around the body area and more combinations of occupants located in the desks will be analyzed.

Highlights

  • In recent years the concept of personalized ventilation system (PVS) has been introduced

  • The thermal comfort number is the quotient of the effectiveness for heat removal and the PPD, while the air quality number is calculated as the quotient between the effectiveness for contaminant removal and the percentage of dissatisfied (PD) with the indoor air quality (IAQ)

  • In this study one virtual school classroom, with 6 and 12 virtual occupants, is used to evaluate the TC level, effectiveness for heat removal, thermal comfort number, IAQ level, effectiveness for contaminant removal, air quality number, air distribution index (ADI) and draught risk (DR) level associated to a PVS

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In recent years the concept of PVS has been introduced This system is based on positioning one air terminal device in the upper body area. When using more than one air terminal device with incidence in the upper and lower body areas, the IAQ as well as the TC and the DR can be improved. The conventional PVS is characterized by introducing clean, cold (or warm) dry air from an outdoor supply, with low air velocity and low air turbulence intensity to the occupants’ breathing area [1]. This conventional PVS can provide individual control of inlet air temperature, airflow rate and direction

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call