Abstract

MotivationIdentifying mechanism of actions (MoA) of novel compounds is crucial in drug discovery. Careful understanding of MoA can avoid potential side effects of drug candidates. Efforts have been made to identify MoA using the transcriptomic signatures induced by compounds. However, these approaches fail to reveal MoAs in the absence of actual compound signatures.ResultsWe present MoAble, which predicts MoAs without requiring compound signatures. We train a deep learning-based coembedding model to map compound signatures and compound structure into the same embedding space. The model generates low-dimensional compound signature representation from the compound structures. To predict MoAs, pathway enrichment analysis is performed based on the connectivity between embedding vectors of compounds and those of genetic perturbation. Results show that MoAble is comparable to the methods that use actual compound signatures. We demonstrate that MoAble can be used to reveal MoAs of novel compounds without measuring compound signatures with the same prediction accuracy as that with measuring them.Availability and implementationMoAble is available at https://github.com/dmis-lab/moableSupplementary information Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.

Highlights

  • Elucidating mechanism of actions (MoA) of compounds is important in drug discovery process

  • MoAs based on binding affinity only focus on the physical interaction between compounds and target proteins, which neglects the impact of compounds on cellular phenotype

  • We assessed whether connectivity associations between compound signatures and genetic perturbation (GP) signatures can be reproduced in the coembedding space (R256)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Elucidating mechanism of actions (MoA) of compounds is important in drug discovery process. Predicting accurate MoAs of compounds can improve on-target efficacy and avoid potential side effects caused by off-target effects. Without the proper understanding of MoAs, the success rate of clinical trials of drug candidates can decrease (Bantscheff et al, 2007; Editorial, 2010; Wehling, 2009). One approach to identify MoA of compounds is to conduct binding affinity assays. This approach can help to identify target proteins that physically bind to compounds (Davis et al, 2011). MoAs based on binding affinity only focus on the physical interaction between compounds and target proteins, which neglects the impact of compounds on cellular phenotype (e.g. transcriptomic signatures)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.