Abstract

BackgroundBiomedical named-entity recognition (BioNER) is widely modeled with conditional random fields (CRF) by regarding it as a sequence labeling problem. The CRF-based methods yield structured outputs of labels by imposing connectivity between the labels. Recent studies for BioNER have reported state-of-the-art performance by combining deep learning-based models (e.g., bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory) and CRF. The deep learning-based models in the CRF-based methods are dedicated to estimating individual labels, whereas the relationships between connected labels are described as static numbers; thereby, it is not allowed to timely reflect the context in generating the most plausible label-label transitions for a given input sentence. Regardless, correctly segmenting entity mentions in biomedical texts is challenging because the biomedical terms are often descriptive and long compared with general terms. Therefore, limiting the label-label transitions as static numbers is a bottleneck in the performance improvement of BioNER.ResultsWe introduce DTranNER, a novel CRF-based framework incorporating a deep learning-based label-label transition model into BioNER. DTranNER uses two separate deep learning-based networks: Unary-Network and Pairwise-Network. The former is to model the input for determining individual labels, and the latter is to explore the context of the input for describing the label-label transitions. We performed experiments on five benchmark BioNER corpora. Compared with current state-of-the-art methods, DTranNER achieves the best F1-score of 84.56% beyond 84.40% on the BioCreative II gene mention (BC2GM) corpus, the best F1-score of 91.99% beyond 91.41% on the BioCreative IV chemical and drug (BC4CHEMD) corpus, the best F1-score of 94.16% beyond 93.44% on the chemical NER, the best F1-score of 87.22% beyond 86.56% on the disease NER of the BioCreative V chemical disease relation (BC5CDR) corpus, and a near-best F1-score of 88.62% on the NCBI-Disease corpus.ConclusionsOur results indicate that the incorporation of the deep learning-based label-label transition model provides distinctive contextual clues to enhance BioNER over the static transition model. We demonstrate that the proposed framework enables the dynamic transition model to adaptively explore the contextual relations between adjacent labels in a fine-grained way. We expect that our study can be a stepping stone for further prosperity of biomedical literature mining.

Highlights

  • Biomedical named-entity recognition (BioNER) automatically identifies specific mentions of interest such as chemicals, diseases, drugs, genes, DNAs, proteins, viruses etc. in biomedical literature

  • We propose a novel framework, called Dynamic Transition for Named entity recognition (NER) (DTranNER), to incorporate a Deep learning (DL)-based model, which adaptively identify labellabel transition relations to further improve the accuracy of BioNER

  • We evaluated DTranNER by comparing with current state-of-the-art NER methods on five benchmark BioNER corpora to investigate the effectiveness of the DL-based label-label transition model

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Biomedical named-entity recognition (BioNER) automatically identifies specific mentions of interest such as chemicals, diseases, drugs, genes, DNAs, proteins, viruses etc. in biomedical literature. BioNER operates by predicting a class label for each token across biomedical literature. It is typically considered as a sequence labeling problem and is widely modeled by a first-order linear-chain conditional random field (CRF) [5, 6]. Biomedical named-entity recognition (BioNER) is widely modeled with conditional random fields (CRF) by regarding it as a sequence labeling problem. Recent studies for BioNER have reported state-of-the-art performance by combining deep learning-based models (e.g., bidirectional Long Short-Term Memory) and CRF. Problem definition: biomedical named entity recognition (BioNER) An instance of a BioNER corpus consists of an input token sequence x = x1, . To indicate the type of entities, one of the type tags, such as “Chemical,” “Disease,” “Gene,” or “Protein,” is concatenated to each IOBES tag

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call