Abstract

ABSTRACT Survival is often associated with body size, growth rate, and stress, but the latter two are more difficult to observe non-lethally. Non-lethal methods can be particularly important for endangered and culturally valuable species. With fish scales, growth and stress indices could be inferred without needing to sacrifice fish. We examined scales from ~350 wild Chinook salmon (Oncorhynchus tshawytscha) in Valley Creek and at Lower Granite Dam (Pacific Northwest, USA) in 2007–2019. From a von Bertalanffy model and scale circulus spacings, we estimated a brood-year-specific growth coefficient K (hereafter K ˆ ). Using the scale-derived K ˆ and other biological and environmental covariates, we examined how these potential predictors associated with juvenile-to-adult survival of >136,000 passive-integrated-transponder-tagged Chinook salmon from the Snake River Basin (Pacific Northwest, USA). We found that the effects on survival from brood-year-specific K ˆ , fork length of the tagged individuals, and interaction between K ˆ and fork length were positive. We also determined that the proportion of fish samples with regenerated scales (an indicator of stress) had a negative effect on survival. For further refinement of non-lethal, scale-derived indices on survival, we encourage examination of indices across populations, juvenile habitats, and juvenile life stages, and not simply a regional, brood-year-specific growth index.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call