Abstract
This study tests a model of predicting faculty success in the different fields of chemistry, physics, sociology, and political science. The main hypotheses tested and confirmed are: (a) In a field with a low technological development, professional age is more important in predicting faculty success than in a field with a high technological development. (b) In a field with a high technological development, articles are more important in predicting faculty success than in a field with a low technological development. (c) In a field with a low technological development, books are more important in predicting faculty success than in a field with a high technological development.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
