Precisione nella determinazione della lunghezza di lavoro mediante localizzatori elettronici d’apice, radiologia digitale e prova visiva: presentazione di una nuova metodica sperimentale di indagine – uno studio ex-vivo

Abstract

Objectives This study compared: 1) the accuracy of three different electronic apex locators (EALs) in detecting the apical foramen ex-vivo under clinical conditions; 2) the accuracy of digital radiography and EALs in determining the K-file position in the root canal; 3) the accuracy of two different radiographic planes; (4) the precision of #10, #15, and #20 K-files in electronic measurements; 5) the precision of EALs in relation to the dental anatomy classification (anterior, bicuspids, and molars). Materials and methods The length of 101 extracted human teeth was measured with three different EALs (Endex, Propex II and Root ZX), with RVG and compared to the actual length. Experimental procedures were performed using an endodontic training kit (Pro-Train). Results The statistical analysis showed that Endex and Propex II were more accurate than Root ZX in determining the working length (WL). The t-test showed no statistically significant difference of accuracy between the two radiographic planes examined. The t-test showed no significant difference between the three different K-file size measurements. EALs and RVG are less accurate in anterior teeth. Conclusions To prevent overestimation of the root canal length using the EALs tested, 1 mm should be subtracted from the measurement on the “APEX” mark. Instrument sizes did not affect the accuracy of EALs. EALs showed to be more accurate in determining the WL than RVG.