Precision in Norwood Shunt Sizing: Single Ventricle Reconstruction Trial Public Dataset Analysis

Abstract

BackgroundMorbidity and mortality after the Norwood procedure remains high. Shunt size selection is not standardized and the impact of shunt size on outcomes is poorly understood. The Single Ventricle Reconstruction trial randomized infants to modified Blalock-Taussig-Thomas shunt (MBTTS) or right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt at the Norwood procedure. We assessed shunt size distribution and its association with postoperative outcomes. MethodsWe included 544 patients, excluding 5 with ambiguous shunt crossover data. Normalized shunt diameter 1 and 2 were calculated as shunt diameter divided by patient’s weight and body surface area, respectively. The primary outcome was 30-day mortality after Norwood. Secondary outcomes were intensive care and total length of stay, and survival to Glenn procedure. Logistic and ordinal regression models evaluated the association of normalized shunt diameter with outcomes. ResultsThirty-day mortality after Norwood was 11.4% (n = 62), survival to Glenn procedure was 72.6% (n = 395), median length of stay was 14.0 (interquartile range, 9.0-27.7) days and 24.0 (interquartile range, 16.0-41.0) days in the intensive care and total, respectively. Normalized shunt diameters exhibited variation in both shunt types but were not associated with 30-day mortality. Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt size was not associated with secondary outcomes. However, a MBTTS diameter ≥1.5 mm/kg predicted longer Norwood (odds ratio, 4.89; 95% CI, 1.41-16.90) and intensive care (odds ratio, 4.11; 95% CI, 1.25-13.49]) duration. ConclusionsShunt size selection was variable. Right ventricle-to-pulmonary artery shunt had a wider size range seen with favorable outcomes compared with MBTTS. A MBTTS either too large or too small is associated with worse postoperative outcomes. Refining shunt sizing practices can improve surgical outcomes after the Norwood procedure.