Abstract
Three different types of sunitinib-loaded (SUN-loaded) nanocarriers were compared, aiming at the topical treatment of corneal neovascularization (CNV): polymeric nanospheres (NS), liposomes (LIP), and solid lipid nanoparticles (SLN). Three out of eleven formulations prepared for an optimization study – the best SUN-loaded nanocarrier of each assessed type (NS, LIP, and SLN) – were selected, based on their size, polydispersity index (PdI), drug load (DL), and encapsulation efficiency (EE). These three optimal formulations were further characterized by nanoparticle tracking analysis (NTA), electron paramagnetic resonance (EPR) spectroscopy, and zeta potential. In vitro SUN release profiles were obtained for the optimal formulations, along with ex vivo corneal permeability/retention studies, and ocular tolerance assays, namely: the bovine corneal opacity and permeability (BCOP) assay, the HET-CAM test (hen’s egg test – chorioallantoic membrane), and hemolytic potential (HP) assay. None of the optimal formulations exhibited toxicity or potential for ocular irritation. SLN showed higher surface fluidity, drug release more suitable for topical ocular applications, besides greater SUN corneal retention. Our results suggest that SLN are the best CNV-targeting SUN-loaded nanocarriers for clinical translation when compared to their NS and LIP analogues.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
