Abstract
A high accuracy was recently reported for the three-dimensional (3D) computerised planning of total hip arthroplasty (THA), comparing well with navigation regarding leg length and femoral offset. However, there is no randomised study comparing 3D preoperative planning with conventional 2D templating in terms of accuracy and clinical relevance. The 3D pre-operative planning has a higher accuracy than the conventional 2D pre-operative templating regarding the implants size and their positioning. A prospective comparative randomised study was carried out from 2008 to 2009, including two groups of 30 patients who underwent THA for primary osteoarthritis. One surgeon performed all the surgical procedures using a minimally invasive direct anterior approach. In one group, the planning was made on calibrated X-rays using 2D templates. In the other group, a CT-scan based 3D computerised planning was performed with dedicated software. The reconstructed hip final anatomy was compared post-operatively to the preoperative planning and the accuracy was expressed as the mean difference (±SD) between the planned positioning and the final positioning of the implants. The prediction rate for the stem and the cup sizes were respectively of 100% and 96% in the 3D group versus 43% for both components in the 2D group. When combining both components, the prediction rate was 96% in the 3D group versus 16% in the 2D group. In the 3D group, a high accuracy was achieved for the planning of the leg length (−1.8 ± 3.6 mm ranging from −8 to +4 mm) and the femoral offset (−0.07 ± 2.7 mm ranging from −5 to +4 mm) versus 1.37 ± 6.4 mm ranging from −9 to 13 mm and 0.33 ± 5.7 mm (−16 to 11 mm) in the 2D templating group ( P < 0.0001). The 3D planning gives a higher accuracy than conventional 2D templating in forecasting the size of cup and the stem. This contributes to the prediction for leg length and offset that is more reliable with the 3D technique. This study suggests that 3D planning CT-scan data is an attractive alternative to navigation to restore these parameters. The high accuracy achieved by a low-experience surgeon suggests that 3D planning may help shorten the learning curve when using the minimally invasive direct anterior approach. Level III, low-powered prospective randomized trial.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Revue de Chirurgie Orthopédique et Traumatologique
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.