Abstract

Biofuels have transitioned from a technology expected to deliver numerous benefits to a highly contested socio-technical solution. Initial hopes about their potential to mitigate climate change and to deliver energy security benefits and rural development, particularly in the Global South, have unravelled in the face of numerous controversies. In recognition of the negative externalities associated with biofuels, the European Union developed sustainability criteria which are enforced by certification schemes. This paper draws on the literature on stewardship to analyse the outcomes of these schemes in two countries: the UK and Guatemala. It explores two key issues: first, how has European Union biofuels policy shaped biofuel industries in the UK and Guatemala? And second, what are the implications for sustainable land stewardship? By drawing attention to the outcomes of European demand for biofuels, we raise questions about the ability of European policy to drive sustainable land practices in these two cases. The paper concludes that, rather than promoting stewardship, the current governance framework effectively rubberstamps existing agricultural systems and serves to further embed existing inequalities.

Highlights

  • Since the early 1970s, the European Union (EU) has considered the environment to be a ‘matter of the highest importance’ across a number of policy areas, in improving the quality of life for citizens (Hoerber 2013: 157)

  • In recognition of the negative externalities associated with biofuels, the European Union developed sustainability criteria which are enforced by certification schemes

  • We focus on environmental stewardship, and on the schemes which codify the stewardship of land used to produce biofuels

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the early 1970s, the European Union (EU) has considered the environment to be a ‘matter of the highest importance’ across a number of policy areas, in improving the quality of life for citizens (Hoerber 2013: 157). None more so than ethical concerns with regards to food vs fuel, an issue that was rapidly followed by socio-environmental issues related to (in)direct land use change driven by demand for biofuels (Tomei and Helliwell 2016).

Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.