Abstract
Abstract When Darwin (1859) first proposed his theory of natural selection, it was regarded as a radical affront to the established order because it moved Homo sapiens from a special place at God’s right hand to just another randomly selected spot on an ever-changing map. Ironically, some social scientists now seem to regard any application of Darwinian theory to human behavior as an attempt to bolster the established order, supposedly replacing cherished models of random cultural variation with a god-given and inviolable set of genetic blueprints. In particular, a number of social scientists believe that evolutionary theorists wish to lock men and women into rigid “genetically determined” sex roles that position men as omnipotent Gods and women as their humble handmaidens. This misperception is unfortunate for several reasons. To ignore the evolutionary history of any species is to blind oneself to some of the key pieces needed to explain the puzzle of why they do the things they do. This is as true of Homo sapiens as it is of any other living species. Another reason particularly relevant to the psychology of gender differences is that the alternative perspectives have often focused on narrow, male-oriented definitions of power and have failed to give females their due.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.