Abstract

Poverty has consistently been a pervasive phenomenon tackled by public policies as it comes with its batch of intolerable levels of economic, social and political hardship deemed distressing for humankind. Thus, the strategy against this scourge gained increased attention within countries and across the globe. The poverty reduction strategy aims to pull people out of degrading living conditions. The debate on poverty reduction is of paramount significance because various approaches are suggested to address this issue, but with mixed results. That is because often, these approaches apply regardless of the circumstances of place and time. On this note, many keep attributing the success and failure of poverty reduction strategies in Low-Income Countries to the income distribution issue. Hence, this success and failure are thought to be linked to the adjustment between unlimited needs and the allocation of scarce resources required to address socio-economic issues formalised by poverty indicators. Engaged in another perspective, a great deal of literature and evidence suggests that the explanation of this success and failure could well be found upstream, namely, from the industrialisation, economic diversification and growth established as prominent tools to improve social welfare. Indeed, this literature and evidence contend that Low-Income countries are still struggling to manage poverty reduction as their economic circumstances exhibit weak industrialisation as well as inconsequential economic diversification and growth. This literature and evidence could be subject to scrutiny for a better understanding of poverty. Hence, this paper contributes to this debate by assessing selected literature and evidence. It establishes to what extent industrialisation, as well as economic diversification and growth, predispose Low-Income countries’ ability and inability to encounter effectively the issue of poverty. Keywords: Poverty, industrialisation, growth, economic diversification, low-income countries. DOI: 10.7176/JPID/60-04 Publication date: July 31 st 2021

Highlights

  • The debate on poverty reduction and the strategies used to end this multifaceted phenomenon is often cast as one of the public domain issues in which political as well as economic prescriptions clash (Ravallion, 2003

  • Poverty indicators were encapsulated in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which were extended under Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda to incorporate health, education, income inequality, vulnerability to shocks, environment and other aspects (United Nations Development Programme, 2016)3

  • Their study relied upon various World Bank and United Nations Development Programme reports suggesting that with an average economic growth of less than 5%, the incidence of poverty did not decline since the 1990s in the least developed countries

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The debate on poverty reduction and the strategies used to end this multifaceted phenomenon is often cast as one of the public domain issues in which political as well as economic prescriptions clash (Ravallion, 2003). Poverty refers to the situation of a staggeringly large number of people living on less than 1$ a day and does not have access to sufficient food, decent housing, drinking water, quality health care, education and all other elements of life in society (Banerjee et al, 2006). Poverty is well captured through a number of indicators that characterise it. Poverty indicators were encapsulated in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which were extended under Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda to incorporate health, education, income inequality, vulnerability to shocks, environment and other aspects (United Nations Development Programme, 2016). Poverty indicators were encapsulated in the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs), which were extended under Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) of the 2030 Agenda to incorporate health, education, income inequality, vulnerability to shocks, environment and other aspects (United Nations Development Programme, 2016)3 These indicators assess the inability to meet fundamental human needs. Poverty modifies people’s behaviours by making them sensitive to minimum subsistence constraints and dependent on their society

Objectives
Findings
Methods
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call