Abstract

AbstractIn the western United States, fire has become a significant concern in the management of big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata Nutt.) ecosystems. This is due to large‐scale increases in cover of the fire‐prone invasive annual cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum L.) and, concurrently, concerns about declining quantity and quality of habitat for Greater Sage‐grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus). The prevailing paradigm is that fire results in a loss of sage‐grouse habitat on timescales relevant to conservation planning (i.e., 1–20 yr), since sagebrush cover can take many more years to recover post‐fire. However, fire can have effects that improve sage‐grouse habitat, including stimulating perennial grass and forb production. The conditions under which fire results in the permanent loss or enhancement of sage‐grouse habitat are not well understood. We used long‐term data from the Utah Division of Wildlife Resources Range Trend Project to assess short‐term (1–4 yr post‐treatment) and long‐term (6–10 yr post‐treatment) effects of fire on vegetation cover at 16 sites relative to sage‐grouse habitat vegetation guidelines. Sagebrush cover remained low post‐fire at sites considered historically unsuitable for sage‐grouse (<10% initial sagebrush cover). In contrast, at sites that had higher (>10%) pre‐fire sagebrush cover, sagebrush cover decreased to <10% in the short‐term post‐fire, but by 6–10 yr after fire, most of these sites exhibited a recovering trajectory and two sites had recovered to >10% cover. Post‐fire sagebrush cover was positively related to elevation. Across all sites, perennial grasses and forbs increased in cover to approximately meet the habitat vegetation guidelines for sage‐grouse. Cheatgrass cover did not change in response to fire, and increased perennial grass cover appears to have played an important role in suppressing cheatgrass. Our results indicate that, while fire poses a potential risk for sage‐grouse habitat loss and degradation, burned sites do not necessarily need to be considered permanently altered, especially if they are located at higher elevation, have high sagebrush cover pre‐fire, and are reseeded with perennial grasses and forbs post‐fire. However, our results confirm that fire at more degraded sites, for example, those with <10% sagebrush cover, can result in cheatgrass‐dominated landscapes and sagebrush loss at these sites should be avoided.

Highlights

  • Over the past several decades, significant Nutt.) ecosystems of the western United States attention has turned to understanding how best (Wisdom and Chambers 2009, Davies et al 2011, to manage big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata McIver and Brunson 2014, Chambers et al.❖ www.esajournals.orgNovember 2019 ❖ Volume 10(11) ❖ Article e02870 RIGINOS ET AL.2017a)

  • Where pre-fire sagebrush cover was

  • Recent recommendations have focused on avoiding the use of prescribed fire in big sagebrush ecosystems because of concerns that fire will suppress sagebrush cover for decades to come and that fire increases the risk of cheatgrass spread (Nelle et al 2000, Wambolt et al 2001, Rhodes et al 2010, Condon et al 2011, Davies et al 2011, Beck et al 2012, Hess and Beck 2012, U.S Fish and Wildlife Service 2013, Utah PLPCO 2018)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Over the past several decades, significant Nutt.) ecosystems of the western United States attention has turned to understanding how best (Wisdom and Chambers 2009, Davies et al 2011, to manage big sagebrush (Artemisia tridentata McIver and Brunson 2014, Chambers et al.❖ www.esajournals.orgNovember 2019 ❖ Volume 10(11) ❖ Article e02870 RIGINOS ET AL.2017a). Land managers are challenged with managing widespread and rapid change in these ecosystems and supporting declining populations of the Greater Sage-grouse (Centrocercus urophasianus, sage-grouse), a sagebrush obligate (Connelly et al 2011). Fire risks have increased in part due to large-scale increases in the fire-prone invasive annual cheatgrass (Bromus tectorum, downy brome; Balch et al 2013, Chambers et al 2014). Compounding this risk is the fact that sagebrush cover can take decades to recover to pre-fire levels (Baker 2006, Lesica et al 2007)

Methods
Results
Conclusion

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.