Abstract

Using decision trees, a model to discriminate between potential drugs and nondrugs has been developed. Compounds from the Available Chemical Directory and the World Drug Index databases were used as training set; the molecular structures were represented using extended atom types. The error rate on an independent validation data set is 17.4%. The number of false negatives can be reduced by penalizing the misclassification of drugs so that 92 out of 100 potential drugs are correctly recognized. At the same time, 34 out of 100 nondrugs are classified as potential drugs. The predictions of the model can be used to guide the purchase or selection of compounds for biological screening or the design of combinatorial libraries. The visualization of the generated models in the form of colored trees allowed us to identify a few, surprisingly simple features that explain the most significant differences between drugs and nondrugs in the training set: Just by testing the presence of hydroxyl, tertiary or secondary amino, carboxyl, phenol, or enol groups, already three quarters of all drugs could be correctly recognized. The nondrugs, on the other hand, are characterized by their aromatic nature with a low content of functional groups besides halogens. The general applicability of the model is shown by the predictions made for several Organon databases.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.