Abstract

This study was conducted to evaluate the potency of Brucea javanica (melur) for controlling two species ofcrucifer pests, i.e. Crocidolomia pavonana and Plutella xylostella. Melur fruits, twigs, and leaves were extracteddirectly with methanol or sequentially with hexane, ethyl acetate, and methanol. The most active extract was thenfractionated by preparative layer chromatography using hexane, mixtures of ethyl acetate and methanol, andmethanol as eluents. The most active fraction was formulated as EC (emulsifiable concentrate) and WP (wettablepowder) formulations, and tested for their toxicity and antifeedant effect against C. pavonana and P. xylostellalarvae. The results showed that methanol extract of melur fruits was more active than that of twigs and leaves.Fractionation of methanol extract of melur fruits yielded an active fraction which was eluted with ethyl acetate-methanol 9:1. EC and WP formulations of melur fruits were active against C. pavonana larvae with LC50 of 0.39%and 0.21%, respectively. The same formulations were also active against P. xylostella larvae with LC50 of 0.31% and0.54%, respectively. In no-choice tests, the antifeedant effect of the EC formulation on C. pavonana larvae (feedinginhibition [FI]: 70.9%-97.5%) was higher than on P. xylostella larvae (FI: 52.2%-83.9%), but the antifeedant effect ofthe WP formulation on the two species was relatively the same. In a choice test, the EC formulation at LC 85completely inhibited feeding by C. pavonana larvae (FI: 100%).

Highlights

  • This study was conducted to evaluate the potency of Brucea javanica for controlling two species of crucifer pests, i.e. Crocidolomia pavonana and Plutella xylostella

  • The most active fraction was formulated as EC and WP formulations, and tested for their toxicity and antifeedant effect against C. pavonana and P. xylostella larvae

  • The results showed that methanol extract of melur fruits was more active than that of twigs and leaves

Read more

Summary

BAHAN DAN METODE

Ampas dari ekstrak etil asetat dikeringkan lagi, kemudian ampas masing-masing bagian tanaman direndam ulang dengan 500 ml metanol. Komponen ekstrak diperiksa secara kualitatif menggunakan teknik kromatografi lapisan tipis (thin layer chromatography–TLC) menggunakan pelat aluminium TLC berlapis gel silika (Silica Gel F254, Merck) sebagai penjerap dan pengembang yang terdiri dari campuran pelarut etil asetat: metanol: asam asetat90:9:1 sebanyak 100 ml. Pengujian antifeedant tanpa pilihan sejalan dengan uji toksisitas yaitu daun perlakuan pada hari pertama langsung dipetakan di atas kertas milimeter untuk dihitung jumlah luas daun yang dimakan. Pada perlakuan dengan pilihan hanya dilakukan untuk formulasi EC saja dimana empat lembar daun (2 daun perlakuan dan 2 daun kontrol masingmasing berukuran 2,5 cm x 2,5 cm) dimasukkan ke dalam cawan petri (diameter 9 cm) yang dialasi tisu. Konsentrasi komponen aktif yang digunakan setara dengan LC5, LC25, LC45, LC65, dan LC85 berdasarkan hasil uji toksisitas terhadap larva instar 2 C. pavonana di atas. Data AF dianalisis dengan sidik ragam yang dilanjutkan dengan uji selang berganda Duncan (Steel et al, 1997)

HASIL DAN PEMBAHASAN
Metanol Langsung
Toksisitas formulasi buah melur terhadap
Kontrol Perlakuan
DAFTAR PUSTAKA
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call