Abstract
Most children continue to live with their mother after a divorce or separation, yet paternal involvement in post-separation families has increased substantially in many Western nations. This shift has contributed to a growing share and more diverse set of post-separation parents opting for shared physical custody (SPC), which typically means that children alternate between the parental residences for substantive amounts of time. Profiling the case of Germany, where no legal regulations facilitating SPC are implemented to date, we examine the prevalence of SPC families, sociodemographic correlates of SPC, and its associations with parental coparenting and child adjustment. Using representative survey data sampled in 2019 (N = 800 minors of 509 separated parents), results revealed that only 6–8% of children practiced SPC. SPC parents were more likely to hold tertiary levels of schooling and to report a better coparenting relationship with the other parent. There was no link between SPC and child adjustment, yet conflictual coparenting was linked to higher levels of hyperactivity among SPC children. We conclude that the social selection into SPC and linkages between conflictual coparenting and hyperactivity among SPC children likely stem from the higher costs and the constant level of communication between the ex-partners that SPC requires.
Highlights
Shared physical custody (SPC) after separation and divorce has become a widely debated issue, in family law, and in social science research in many countries (Walper et al 2021)
DiscuTshsisonstudy contributes to the emerging literature on shared physical custody (SPC) in jurisdictional contexts laTckhiinsgslteugdalyancdonintrstiibtuuttieosnatlosuthpepoermt foerrgSiPnCginlitceornatrtausrtetoomnaSnPyCothinerjWureisstderinctnioantioanl scontexts
We examined the prevalence of SPC in Germany, issues related to social selection into SPC, and its associations with child adjustment
Summary
Shared physical custody (SPC) after separation and divorce has become a widely debated issue, in family law, and in social science research in many countries (Walper et al 2021). The number of studies that addressed issues of selectivity into post-separation physical custody arrangements are more limited (Poortman and van Gaalen 2017; Sodermans et al 2013; Recksiedler and Bernardi 2021). Both lines of research are important and even mutually dependent, especially because questions concerning the role of custody in children’s well-being cannot be adequately answered without considering the selective use of SPC (Fehlberg et al 2011).
Published Version (Free)
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have