Abstract

Summary. Although post-glacial rebound data have been conventionally interpreted as being governed by the steady state component of the mantle viscosity spectrum, the radial profile of this parameter, which is then inferred by fitting a model to observations, is characterized by the fact that it exhibits rather slight variation with depth. This disagrees with expectations based upon microphysical models of the solid state creep process. It also disagrees with very recent inferences of the viscosity stratification based on isostatic geoid anomalies expected on the basis of the internal lateral heterogeneity of mantle density obtained from seismic tomographic analyses. The new calculations of the signatures of post-glacial rebound reported here show that these two types of information are easily reconciled if the previously inferred value of the lower mantle viscosity is interpreted as a transient value, as originally suggested by Weertman on the basis of qualitative considerations. In these new models considered here the steady state creep resistance of the lower mantle is not constrained at all by post-glacial rebound observations. It can be futed only by an appeal to other geophysical data. Whether such models are actually required by the data should become clear in the very near future.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call