Post‐Fordism? Technology and Mew Forms of Control: the case of technology in the curriculum

Abstract

Technology is changing not only our material reality, but also our social roles and power positions within the social structure. Whilst its increasingly widespread applications in industry, on the one hand, facilitate production processes they also contribute to the marginalisation and displacement of particular groups of people within the labour force (Sivanandan, 1989; Pollert, 1988). Thus, technology can “embody specific forms of power and authority” (Winner, 1986, p. 19). This article considers the view that Technology as a reconstituted subject in the National Curriculum in England and Wales functions to a large extent as a means of naturalising evolving work practices and specific worker awarenesses required within the technological production process. It also serves to legitimate real and symbolic differences created between the new ‘technical’ knowledge elites and the functionaries within the production process. The accommodation in the technology curriculum of new structural changes occurring within society can then be regarded as an attempt by the state to rationalise, in pupils’ consciousness, the basis of a reformulated capitalist economic order.